Why should i buy prime lenses? and what is a good one? - prime lenses
I know that the restriction be, but that's what they are for other purposes. I have a 500D with 18-55mm Lens Kit can convince me to buy a fixed focal length? THANK Dood
Monday, January 11, 2010
Prime Lenses Why Should I Buy Prime Lenses? And What Is A Good One?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Spiritual fifty years, or what is called, is really strong and really cheap lens Canon
EF 50mm f/1.8 craigslist can be made almost 90 million new on Amazon or $ 50-80.
50mm 80mm EFOV is a growing body which makes them an accurate picture of Nice.
I use a slightly older Pentax lenses on my first charge (using an adapter), in reality, such as lenses, in order to begin manual for a digital camera. The manual focus and zoom can not really do you think the shot before it.
An important goal is usually anywhere from 1.4 to 2.8 at the maximum aperture, the objective of more light and faster. As is only good at a focal length are smaller and lighter and less expensive than equivalent quality high zoom ratio. The IC is generally better in the context of a zoom.
However, there is a zoom as well, and can his place in the photo pockets. If you want to travel, increase in any case, good for you to take only one lens.
I've never been a supporter of the first glass. But it depends entirely on what you need to do. I'm kind of portrait. He knew that despite the appearance of a limiting factor, as I do, what each was doing based. So I did. I have a 50mm upwards. Sure was quicker. Best quality, not necessarily. I have a Tokina 100mm high risk and surprise. I'm sold on them. It is a long shadow of what I am now, but if I will be my major study to be perfect. So now I'm looking for a 85mm f/1.8, not because they afford the f/1.4. If you seem to buy any situations that should work right away, too. Not feel obligated to buy one. In terms of quality, I think my Nikkor 18-135 the sharpest lens I have is also for portraits. Openings represent large and fast shutter nothing for me, if I shoot in the studio with 4 or 5 flashes at once. Buy the best glass that you can afford, but make sure you use something and not just sit in your pocket.
I swapped my 18-55 for 35mm Nikon F1.8 lens. Be limited by the lack of zoom seems, but in reality it is not, at least for me. The little me was the slow opening of 3.5-5.6 goal of the kit, like me, a lot of photography in low light. Sometimes I regret that 18-28mm wide, which I am in a crowded room. But that's all.
Together with my 35mm F1.8, I have a 55-200mm telephoto.
You may find that 50mm a little long, but the smaller sensor size. As mentioned above, it is 80 mm 35 mm terms. I do not know if Canon's 35-mm lens (or something similar) for a normal lens into its small sensor digital SLR camera has had to observe, however.
The previous answers are good.
Another thing you will notice that the main objective is usually much faster than comparable focal lengths, zoom is.
Their 18-55 mm zoom is about 5.6 to 55 mm. A 50 mm can be as fast as f / 1.2 or 1.4, if you have too much money in my pocket
Prime lenses are sharper than approached as a standard. You can also better control of chromatic aberrations. They are also more frequent in the continuous opening (number / 2.8 / 4) in low light or fast motion capture.
If you are planning your second glass, the other option would be a 70-300mm telephoto zoom.
In the first, since you have 18-55mm, you can imagine 85mm/f1.8.
Post a Comment